Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom 'Humane' Hypocrisy On Veal
This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.
|
| |    August 8, 2007 | | | | | 'Humane' Hypocrisy On Veal
It's a challenge to keep track of the assorted misinformation that emanates from the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). A group that takes regular advantage of the confusion caused by its very name, after all -- as an actual hands-on humane society in Pittsburgh is discovering this week -- can't be expected to shoot straight most of the time. Witness HSUS's continued obsession with promoting a "boycott" of Canadian seafood that we've already meticulously documented as phony (also see here, here, here, and here). And the group's questionable fundraising tactics in the wake of the Michael Vick scandal. HSUS's latest trek into the surreal is its reaction to a coming sea change in veal farming. In May the American Veal Association recommended that U.S. veal farmers "convert to the group housing methodology by December 31, 2017" -- setting a ten-year goal for changing a whole industry that mostly houses veal calves in crates. The larger beef industry says that its goal is to see it done "by 2014," but "it will take time, because farmers have to invest resources into remodeling or rebuilding."
One big player in the veal industry has indicated that it hopes to make its transition "within the next two or three years." Another articulates its plan in terms of "the next several years." It's clear to most honest observers that nobody really knows how long an industry-wide shift will take. But HSUS, being opposed to the very idea of veal, isn't exactly an honest observer. Yesterday HSUS released a statement claiming that a ten-year timetable is too long, "considering that the nation's largest veal producers have already committed to a two-year phaseout." Oops. Not true. Plans and goals aren't commitments. And if HSUS were really interested in helping veal farmers move this expensive transition along, we're left to wonder why it lobbied last month against a federal Farm Bill subsidy for them -- and publicly rejoiced when it was killed. But it gets stranger still. HSUS, knowing that the veal industry is already making the very incremental change it has publicly whined for, is planning a 2008 ballot initiative that would immediately outlaw veal crates in California. (The organizer tasked with collecting signatures describes it as an HSUS-supported enterprise.) HSUS has poured big money into similar campaigns in Florida and Arizona. So here's the real deal on veal: To our ears, HSUS is sounding more and more like PETA -- a wealthy meat abolitionist group that pays lip service to the notion of animal welfare (and stretches the truth) when it's good for fundraising.
Breaking News
Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.
 | | 
| | | | Copyright (c) 2007 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 27414 | Washington, DC 20038 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com | |
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.
|
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
No comments:
Post a Comment