Thursday, December 6, 2007

Facebook News

Keeping up with news about Facebook and Myspace can be a pretty interesting
read.

Facebook

The Facebook Blog:
http://blog.facebook.com

Facebook blog post apologizing for the big woops they made with the beacon
program:
http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=7584397130

Inside Facebook
http://www.insidefacebook.com

Site that contains a link to the privacy preference allowing users to opt out of
beacons:

Facebook adds universal opt-out to Beacon; this time, the PR comes ...
By Justin Smith
This morning, in response to the complaints from privacy advocates that
have been well-documented in recent weeks, Facebook added a Beacon
preference to allow users to universally opt-out of Beacon. Now, if
users globally opt-out, ...
http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/12/05/facebook-adds-universal-opt-out-to-beacon-this-time-the-pr-comes-from-zuckerberg/

All Facebook
http://www.allfacebook.com

Post on allfacebook:
Facebook Listens to the Blogosphere
By Nick O'Neill
Last night I briefly ranted about Facebook not responding to the noise.
Initially, they may have perceived it as only being chatter among
bloggers. As soon as I heard that brands were beginning to become
hesitant about advertising on ...
http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/12/facebook-listens-to-the-blogosphere/

Facebook and Relationships:

If it's Facebook, it's love
Reuters - USA
By Joanne Kenen With profiles on the Facebook social networking site almost
de rigueur on college campuses, students can define their relationship
status ...
http://features.us.reuters.com/techlife/news/A582F772-A2BF-11DC-BE5C-A0488271.html

More over the Facebook Beacon Frackus

Facebook's foolish foes [Media]
By Owen Thomas
I remember, distinctly, when former Business 2.0 editor Josh Quittner's
love affair with Facebook began this spring. He couldn't stop talking
about it, and I could hardly avoid hearing about it,... [[ This is a
content summary only. ...
http://valleywag.com/tech/media/facebooks-foolish-foes-330424.php

Sunday, November 4, 2007

ROTFLMHO!

I took a quiz on Facebook, "What epoch hero are you?"

And if you know me and are familiar with my online handles and rp/creative
writing characters, this might give you a chuckle as well. My result:

Indiana Jones (Raiders of the Lost Ark)
Clever and highly intelligent, you are the paradox of the typical classroom
sort. You represent Harrison Ford as Dr. Jones, the most famous adventurer in
American cinematic history. Your quick wit, disarming charm, and unexpected
bravery are easily hidden in your daily rabble and revealed in the quest for the
incredible.

"Indy" of all people! Lol! Absolute coolness, but lololol!

Friday, November 2, 2007

Spam School, So To Speak - ROFLOL!!

Here's an article sassing back at spammers. It isn't written by me, so it's
hilarious IMO. It's also worth sharing because like anything else I don't write
but do share, it is not a chain letter forward. :)

--

Originally found at:
http://www.columbusdispatch.com/live/content/life/stories/2007/11/01/1A_BLUN01.ART_ART_11-01-07_D1_M08AL6T.html?sid=101

SO TO SPEAK
Listen up, spammers: Your e-mail is stale
Thursday, November 1, 2007 4:06 AM
By JOE BLUNDO

Welcome to the School for Spammers.

Through the years, I've noticed that e-mail spam, while impressive in volume,
keeps getting worse in quality. Even the Nigerian fraud letters no longer ring
with the false sincerity they once did.

So I've decided to offer a remedial course for spammers who might be wondering
why no one orders their fake Rolexes or falls for their bogus European Lottery
messages.

Here are answers to your elementary questions, spammers:

• Is e-mail in Russian an effective way to communicate with an English-speaking
audience?

No -- or, because you seem stubbornly wedded to the language, nyet.

Judging from my e-mail in-box, which resembles the Moscow phone book on any
given morning, you have not quite caught on to the fact that Americans don't use
the Cyrillic alphabet. You might as well be writing in Chinese. Oh, wait, you're
already doing that, too.

So here's tip No. 1: If you want to improve your communication skills, start by
writing in a language that your audience understands. Details matter, people.

• I get poor response to my hoax e-mail informing people they've won $75 million
in an obscure foreign lottery. Should I increase the phony prize money to $100
million?

No, because the next crook will falsely award $150 million and then you'll have
to up your phony jackpot to $200 million. Things could get out of control.

You might have better luck telling people that, for the low price of 49 cents,
you will never e-mail them about a fake lottery prize again.

• If I write "You will love this, Shaun" in the subject line, will you love it?

No. Especially if my name isn't Shaun.

• How effective is bad grammar in making my e-mail more believable?

It definitely beats those spam messages that consist of random numbers and
symbols. Other than that, I don't see it as a winning strategy.

If I'm literate enough to read e-mail, I'm probably literate enough to know that
great stock-market tips rarely come from people who write, "You're next
oppurtunity are now!"

Also, remember that it's difficult to simultaneously defraud people and amuse
them.

That's why this kind of message might not prove convincing: "Notice of Closing
Your Account: To protect your private, we have locked Account # 76245. Please to
reply us urgent."

• When trying to evade spam filters, is it better to write "p*nis" or "p#nis"?

You could spell it "p*#@$" and most guys would get your drift -- because it is
the official body part of the spam world. In other words, they're onto you.

If you decide to forge ahead anyway, watch your syntax. You might imagine that a
subject line reading "We're here for your p*nis" conveys caring and concern
about a man's well-being. But it could also be interpreted as a threat of
confiscation.

Guys are generally put off by that idea.

• Would you like to buy some herbal V1agr@ for only 99 cents a bottle?

Nyet.

Joe Blundo is a Dispatch columnist.

jblundo@dispatch.com

Thursday, October 25, 2007

ConsumerFreedom Memo To Congress: The Physicians Committee Isn't One

Center for Consumer Freedom Daily News
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:49 AM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom Memo To Congress: The Physicians Committee Isn't One


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Animal Rights October 25, 2007
 
 
Memo To Congress: The Physicians Committee Isn't One

Memo To Congress: The Physicians Committee Isn't One

PCRM adYesterday the grossly misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) directed its lobbying muscle toward using the federal farm bill to hurt ranchers and other livestock farmers. The group asked its supporters for phone calls to support legislation that would "reduce [farmer] subsidies overall, which means less support for meat."Most federal farmer subsidies, PCRM explained, "support meat, …dairy products, and animal feed." Sounds like PETA, right? That's because the two groups are essentially different sides of the same coin. (For a primer, click here, here, here, here, and here.)Federal lawmakers deserve to know that when PCRM lobbies them, it's an animal rights group talking -- not a mainstream medical charity. So in this morning's issue of Roll Call, we're calling a spade a spade. Click here to read our ad.

Menu labeling has already taken a legal beating in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan and still bears fresh political scars after being vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger in California. But some politicians just aren't getting the hint. Luckily, in an op-ed in today's Philadelphia Daily News, the Center for Consumer Freedom draws a very simple diagram of the best place to put these food cop warning labels:

Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown's bill -- the latest quick-fix diet scheme proposed in the name of public health -- assumes consumers can't tell the difference between french fries and fruit cups. It would require restaurants to turn their menus into encyclopedias featuring long lists of nutritional warnings next to every item. For most of us, a back page of fat-and-calorie notes would suffice. But Brown, who wrongly believes it will encourage better eating habits, would rather force us to suffer through the informational equivalent of an ice-cream headache before ordering lunch.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  Cartoons

Copyright © 2007 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Missing Kid Hoaxes Started by the Kids Themselves

Missing Nanaimo Teen Email is a Big Hoax

http://www.canada.com/vancouverisland/nanaimo/story.html?id=4f7749de-8e18-487b-948e-8b30bf42b78a

Furthermore, it's also a rip-off of the Evan Trembley hoax.

http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/evantrembley.html which was started as a
sick joke on Myspace by the real and not missing Evan Trembley himself.

It borrows content from the Ashley Flores hoax
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/ashleyflores.html
which was started by one of the real and not missing Ashley's friends on Myspace
as a sick joke, and borrows heavily from the Penny Brown hoax
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/pennybrown.html
which is a mutation of the Kelsey Brook Jones chain, which was true for the two
hours that kelsey was thought missing. Kelsey was found playing, and unharmed
two hours after her mother's initial panic.
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/kelsey.html

http://www.breakthechain.org/missing.html

People who start hoaxes like that should be penalized, because they are getting
very sick kicks at others' expense!
It's manipulative, attention-seeking behavior on a level that is so low and
disgusting because people are getting jerked around just so a few childish teens
can get their haw-haws.

Ignorance or lack of forethought as no excuse.

Playing pranks on your friends in a social network like Myspace is bad enough,
but when it's in the form of a chain letter, it's not going to stay just among
the friends of the hoaxter. This is because your circle of friends also has
their own circles of friends, which in turn, have their own circle of friends,
so, you start a hoax about yourself as missing or dying or whatever, and your
friends might think it's funny, but somebody else who is listed as one of their
friends but not listed as your friend, looks at this friend's profile and
bulletins, and this stranger looking at your friend's profile, sees your
missing/dying hoax and assumes it's for real, and compulsively passes it along
to their friends, who pass it on to theirs.

So, yet more reasons chain letters really stink, and why starting a hoax might
get you the controll over the masses and the attention you desire, but it could
also land you and those associated with you in a pile of inconvenience if not
trouble.

I'm very sorry for anyone these hoaxes have hurt, from those who were taken in
by them, (hopefully they'll know better than pass on chain email from now on) to
those who are friends of or related to the hoaxter and suffering fallout because
of the hoax.

But as for the hoaxters themselves, I wish they would get a lot more than just a
slap on the wrist for their self-serving, inconsiderate and just plain sick
actions.

Evan Trembley was exceedingly stupid to start a hoax about himself, as was the
friend of Ashley Flores. The guy who mooched off the Trembley hoax and made it
about himself as a missing kid in Nanaimo is just as guilty. Shame on them!

Full article about the Nanaimo prank:

http://www.canada.com/vancouverisland/nanaimo/story.html?id=4f7749de-8e18-487b-948e-8b30bf42b78a

Missing Nanaimo Teen Email is a Big Hoax

Nanaimo Daily News Missing teen e-mail is a big hoax
Plea urging people to look out for Nanaimo boy is a prank that first began in
Texas
Derek Spalding , Daily News
Published: Thursday, October 11, 2007
Nanaimo RCMP say its unfortunate that someone is circulating a fake missing
person notice through e-mail accounts.

Thousands of Harbour City residents have recently received a message in their
inbox about a missing teenager from Nanaimo, but the chain mail is nothing but a
hoax. The message asks recipients to please "pass this to everyone in your
address book" in hopes that someone will have seen 15-year-old Evan Trembley.
After a simple Internet search, however, the real story behind the prank is
revealed.

Evan Trembley of Wichita, Falls, Tex, created a fake Amber Alert with himself as
the missing person. He then sent it out to his friends on MySpace.com. Then a
few people who didn't know it was a joke, sent the e-mail out to everyone on
their list. Police exposed Trembley who said he thought his "friends would
recognize it, get a laugh out of it" and delete it, he told reporters in
Wichita.

****But then people who weren't his friends took it seriously and continued to
e-mail all their friends. Trembley and his mother Tammy said they do not expect
any criminal charges.

It appears someone in Nanaimo decided to localize Trembley's prank and
distributed it throughout the city. Using the same photo and similar
information, Trembley now appears to be a missing Nanaimo boy. This week, the
e-mail reached Robin Dutton, owner of Arrowsmith Bikes, who then forwarded it to
more than 300 people on his mailing list.

"I just thought, if somebody's missing, it doesn't take a whole lot for me to
send it out to everyone in my address book," he said before expressing his
disappointment in the hoax. "I just think it's really unfortunate. I'd like to
think that people have a bit more to do rather than waste people's time."

DSpalding@nanaimodailynews.com

250-729-4231

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

ConsumerFreedom Obesity Bandwagon Careening Toward Economic Crisis?

Center for Consumer Freedom Daily News
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:06 AM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom Obesity Bandwagon Careening Toward Economic Crisis?


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Big Fat Lies October 10, 2007
 
 
Obesity Bandwagon Careening Toward Economic Crisis?

Obesity Bandwagon Careening Toward Economic Crisis?

America is caught in the middle of an "informational cascade" where subsequent scientists build new premises on the claims of previous researchers. If the first scientists in the line of research got it right, then … well, there's nothing really to discuss. But if the initial findings were flawed, every theory built on that conclusion is also kaput. Welcome to obesity research.

Yesterday, New York Times science reporter John Tierney outlined this "cascade" phenomenon as it relates to "expert" diet recommendations: 

The notion that fatty foods shorten your life began as a hypothesis based on dubious assumptions and data; when scientists tried to confirm it they failed repeatedly. The evidence against Häagen-Dazs was nothing like the evidence against Marlboros.

Tierney sought out "the most rigorous meta-analysis of the clinical trials of low-fat diets" and discovered that it found no significant impact on mortality. More recent research has also broken away from the group-think. A study in the prestigious Lancet medical journal found that people with low BMIs, not the overweight or obese, had the highest risk of heart disease and early death. But the media didn't widely cover these findings that contradicted the party line.

Instead, the report covered by multiple news outlets found that Cuba's economic downturn had led to a substantial drop in average calories eaten (aka "famine") and a decrease in obesity rates (aka "starvation"). The researchers recommend that the U.S. look to Cuba's "successful" experience as a dietary standard. (Never mind that premature death rates among the elderly actually inched upward and there was an epidemic of degenerative nerve damage as a result of widespread malnutrition.) 

These reduced-fat, low-salt, no-food recommendations -- besides being unjustified -- may well have unintended consequences as severe as those observed in the Cuba study. If Americans hope to avoid the lemmings' fate, they should tune out the latest nutrition survey and fad diets. Rather, heed the advice of Dr. Edward H. Ahrens Jr., a distinguished researcher who spoke out against the erroneous 1970s Congressional report that advised Americans to eat less fat:

This is a matter … of such enormous social, economic and medical importance that it must be evaluated with our eyes completely open. Thus I would hate to see this issue settled by anything that smacks of a Gallup poll.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  ObesityMyths.com

Copyright © 2007 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Stupid Fanatical Food Cops: Not Worth Their Weight In Salt

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:34 AM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom Food Cops: Not Worth Their Weight In Salt


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Food Police October 9, 2007
 
 
Food Cops: Not Worth Their Weight In Salt

Food Cops: Not Worth Their Weight In Salt

Food-police activists have compared trans fats to arsenic, cupcakes to contraband, and—most recently—salt to the plague. Over the weekend, the Chicago Tribune quoted one nutrition "expert" who likened the effects of salt to "AIDS, malaria, terrorism, obesity, high cholesterol and tobacco." This epidemic of hyperbole is nothing new. Over the past decade, nutrition zealots at the Center for Science in the Public Interest have repeatedly petitioned the FDA to revoke salt's "generally recognized as safe" status and treat it as a food additive for the purposes of regulation, which would allow strict limits on the salt content of processed foods.

For many activists spreading these food fears, the facts seem largely irrelevant. There's no scientific consensus on the issue, let alone concrete evidence of a universal relationship between salt intake and hypertension. In fact, only a small minority of people—tagged as "salt-sensitive"—respond to changes in dietary sodium. For the rest of us, studies have shown that the consequences of too little salt can be deadly. 

Common sense dictates that we can't simply cut salt out of our diets. For thousands of years people have used it for currency, medicine, and preservation of food. Unlike the self-important food cops, salt is truly essential for life itself.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  ObesityMyths.com

Copyright © 2007 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---